ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
[Vaccination of immunocompromised individuals: Expert opinion - update 2026].
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosuppression of various origins is associated with an increased risk of infections and infection-triggered morbidity and mortality. Vaccination, therefore, plays a central role in the care of immunosuppressed individuals by protecting against vaccine-preventable diseases.Based on the available evidence as well as immunological and theoretical considerations, an expert statement on vaccination in immunocompromised individuals was first formulated in 2016. These recommendations have herewith been comprehensively updated and expanded. The aim is to provide a practice-oriented, indication- and therapy-specific guidance document for clinical care. A practical chart accompanying the present vaccination recommendation, which also functions as a decision tree for implementation, facilitates orientation within the document.The document includes an introductory section outlining fundamental aspects of immunosuppression and addressing immunological and organizational issues relevant to vaccination planning, application, and control of vaccination responsiveness. In addition, current developments regarding relevant vaccines are reviewed.Subsequently, a systematic overview of immunosuppressive agents commonly used across medical specialties is provided. These agents are categorized according to their degree of immunosuppression and the associated infection risks. Standardized vaccination schedules are provided and assigned to the respective drug classes to facilitate a structured approach in clinical practice. The decision on vaccination eligibility of these patients can only be made based on a comprehensive assessment of the underlying disease and the planned or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy.Special clinical situations-including circumstances in which vaccination cannot be performed, as well as travel-related vaccinations in the context of immunosuppression-are addressed in separate chapters. To ensure long-term relevance, the document refers to continuously updated external sources throughout, which are compiled at the end.This document acts as general recommendation without a claim of completeness. The specific procedure in clinical practice can be adapted to the clinical context, and the reader is referred to the respective professional societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.