Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397414›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Stress and resilience: cortisol hypo-response to acute stress in non-resilient individuals.

Nadine D Riske, Charlotte Schenk, Kira F Ahrens, Bianca Kollmann, Danuta Weichert, Nadine Steinbach, Jana F Burlage, Florian Freudenberg, Klaus Lieb, Raffael Kalisch and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nadine D RiskeDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. nadine.riske@gmx.de.
Charlotte SchenkDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kira F AhrensDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Bianca KollmannLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
Danuta WeichertDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Nadine SteinbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jana F BurlageDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Florian FreudenbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Klaus LiebDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Raffael KalischLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
Oliver TüscherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Maren Schmidt-KassowDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Michael M PlichtaDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience-the outcome of effective adaptation to adversity-is a dynamic construct referring to the preservation or quick recovery of mental health in the face of significant stressors. Despite the crucial role of the acute stress response in coping with adversity, no consensus exists regarding its relationship with resilience. Inconsistent findings may be due to variability in the assessment of resilience. The present study investigates the relationship between resilience and acute stress responses by comparing resilient and non-resilient individuals in their responses to experimentally induced acute stress. A novel approach was used, combining the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test (SECPT) as a reliable and replicable stress induction method with a uniquely characterized sample whose resilience had been assessed in a prior longitudinal study. Based on these longitudinal assessments of stressor reactivity, participants (N = 48) were classified as resilient (14 female / 10 male; age in years: M = 34.5, SD = 9.32) or non-resilient (17 female / 7 male; age in years: M = 31.6, SD = 5.52). Salivary cortisol and subjective measures (subjective stress and State Anger) were assessed before and 20 min after stress induction. Resilience was associated with cortisol reactivity, with non-resilient participants showing significantly lower cortisol responses to the SECPT compared to the resilient participants (F(1,45) = 4.252, p= 0.045). Subjective measures did not differ between groups in terms of reactivity. However, non-resilient participants reported higher overall levels of subjective stress (F(1,43) = 4.780, p= 0.034). It remains to be clarified whether resilience determines cortisol reactivity or whether cortisol reactivity represents a mechanism underlying resilience.

Indexed as

CortisolHypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axisResilienceStress

Identifiers

PMID42397414

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.