Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397625›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Cardioimmunology of Myocarditis: Targeting the IL-1 Pathway.

Emanuele Chiara, Maurizio Pieroni, Michel Obeid, Giacomo Emmi, Danilo Malandrino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emanuele ChiaraDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Maurizio PieroniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Florence, Italy.
Michel ObeidCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Immunology and Allergy Service, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giacomo EmmiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. giacomo.emmi@units.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-8321
Danilo MalandrinoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMyocarditis is a heterogeneous inflammatory syndrome with aetiologies ranging from viral infection and drug hypersensitivity to systemic autoimmune/autoinflammatory disease and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. In response to these triggers, the innate immune response and inflammasome activation can amplify myocardial injury via IL-1, providing a mechanistic rationale for IL-1 pathway inhibition as a targeted therapeutic strategy. This review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence for IL-1 blockade in myocarditis and related inflammatory cardiac syndromes. RECENT

findingsThe immune system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of myocarditis, both in idiopathic/viral cases and in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases (SAAD). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) has emerged as a key mediator linking inflammation to myocardial dysfunction, supported by experimental and translational evidence implicating activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Clinically, the randomized trial of anakinra in acute myocarditis (ARAMIS) did not improve outcomes in a largely low-risk cohort, but accumulating case reports and small series suggest potential benefit in fulminant/hyperinflammatory myocarditis and chronic active refractory myocarditis. In contrast, IL‑1 inhibitors have robust randomized and real-world evidence in recurrent pericarditis, supporting a myo‑pericardial inflammatory continuum and validating IL‑1 pathway engagement as an actionable target in selected inflammatory cardiac phenotypes. Together, these findings support the evolving concept of cardioimmunology. Current management of myocarditis remains largely supportive, with limited disease-modifying options. Anti-IL-1 therapies, particularly anakinra, have shown promising efficacy in selected severe and refractory cases, with a favourable safety profile. However, evidence is mainly derived from case reports and small series, and robust randomized data are lacking. Key clinical questions remain unresolved, including patient selection, timing of initiation, and treatment duration. Future studies should focus on identifying inflammatory endotypes and evaluating targeted immunomodulatory strategies, including in emerging settings such as ICI-associated myocarditis in which IL‑1 blockade remains investigational.

Indexed as

Interleukin-1Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMyocarditisAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAutoimmune DiseasesHumansImmunity, InnateInflammasomesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSignal TransductionAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInflammasomesInterleukin-1Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsrilonaceptAnakinraCanakinumabInterleukin-1MyocarditisRilonacept

Identifiers

PMID42397625
PMCPMC13331846

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.