ReviewCancer2026
Maintenance therapy in gynecologic malignancies: Current and future state.
Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there have been significant advances in the management of gynecologic malignancies in recent years, individuals with advanced disease continue to have high rates of recurrence. Strategies to decrease rates of recurrence and increase time to recurrence are urgently needed. Historically, prolonged chemotherapy treatment and consolidation therapy were unsuccessful. However, continuation of maintenance therapy after initial chemotherapy may offer improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in select circumstances. In recent years, maintenance agents including VEGF and poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have improved PFS and sometimes even OS among women with ovarian cancer when used as monotherapy or in combination. PARP inhibitors demonstrate particularly robust results in patients with BRCA-mutated disease or other homologous recombination-deficient cancers. In endometrial and cervical cancers, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy and used as maintenance thereafter have improved PFS and OS, with particular benefits noted in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer and PD-L1-positive cervical cancer. Beyond currently available therapies, ongoing trials are exploring additional options for maintenance therapy, including antibody-drug conjugates, hormone-directed therapies, and novel targeted therapies such as XPO-1 inhibitors. Maintenance therapy can be accompanied by increased toxicity and cost; as such, careful consideration must be made about the relative benefit of any given maintenance strategy weighed against potential impacts on quality of life or financial toxicity. This review focuses on current maintenance therapy practices, emerging areas of research, and challenges in this area of study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.