SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Stem cell therapy has emerged as a potential treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), offering the possibility of modifying disease progression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with T1DM. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published until January 2025 that evaluated stem cell therapy in T1DM. The primary outcome was the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level. The secondary outcomes included fasting C-peptide levels, insulin dose reduction, insulin independence, and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Results Eight reports from seven RCTs (169 participants) were included. Stem cell therapy was associated with a marginal reduction in HbA1c at 6 months [mean difference (MD): -0.57%, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.02] but not at 12 months (-0.49%, -0.98 to 0.00). Fasting C-peptide levels (ng/mL) showed slight improvement at both 6 months (0.03, 0.03 to 0.03) and 12 months (0.09, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the participants achieved insulin independence or experienced serious adverse events. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes. Interpretation and conclusions Stem cell therapy may offer marginal improvements in HbA1c and fasting C-peptide levels in T1DM; however, these benefits are of limited clinical significance. Given the small sample sizes, high heterogeneity, and very low certainty of evidence, well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are required to establish the therapeutic role of stem cells in T1DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.