Evidence mapPaperPMID 42397823Full record

SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026

Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Jaivinder Yadav, Jogender Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Lesa Dawman, Jitendra Meena, Lokesh Saini, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Devi Dayal, Rimesh Pal

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaivinder YadavDepartment of Pediatrics (Advanced Pediatrics Centre), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jogender KumarDepartment of Pediatrics (Advanced Pediatrics Centre), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Pediatrics (Advanced Pediatrics Centre), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Lesa DawmanDepartment of Pediatrics (Advanced Pediatrics Centre), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jitendra MeenaDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lokesh SainiDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Bijaya Kumar PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Devi DayalDepartment of Pediatrics (Advanced Pediatrics Centre), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rimesh PalDepartment of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives Stem cell therapy has emerged as a potential treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), offering the possibility of modifying disease progression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with T1DM. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published until January 2025 that evaluated stem cell therapy in T1DM. The primary outcome was the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level. The secondary outcomes included fasting C-peptide levels, insulin dose reduction, insulin independence, and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Results Eight reports from seven RCTs (169 participants) were included. Stem cell therapy was associated with a marginal reduction in HbA1c at 6 months [mean difference (MD): -0.57%, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.02] but not at 12 months (-0.49%, -0.98 to 0.00). Fasting C-peptide levels (ng/mL) showed slight improvement at both 6 months (0.03, 0.03 to 0.03) and 12 months (0.09, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the participants achieved insulin independence or experienced serious adverse events. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes. Interpretation and conclusions Stem cell therapy may offer marginal improvements in HbA1c and fasting C-peptide levels in T1DM; however, these benefits are of limited clinical significance. Given the small sample sizes, high heterogeneity, and very low certainty of evidence, well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are required to establish the therapeutic role of stem cells in T1DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Stem Cell TransplantationC-PeptideGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeC-PeptideGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulinC-peptideHbA1cSafetyStem cellType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42397823
PMCPMC13363004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.