Trial reportJMIR aging2026
Effects of a Combined Zumba and Video Game-Based Cognitive Intervention on Cognitive Function Among Older Adults in Klang Valley, Malaysia: Semirandomized Trial.
Trial report in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Age-related cognitive decline can threaten independence in older adults, creating an urgent need for effective and practical preventive strategies. Nonpharmacological approaches such as physical activity, cognitive stimulation, and combined programs show promise, but their comparative effectiveness and the specific cognitive domains they influence are not yet clearly established. Objective: This study evaluated the effects of 3 nonpharmacological interventions. These consisted of a physical activity program using Zumba, a video game-based cognitive stimulation program, and a combined physical and cognitive program. The aim was to determine their effects on global cognition and specific cognitive domains in community-dwelling older adults in the Klang Valley of Malaysia. A secondary objective was to examine the influence of adherence on cognitive outcomes. Methods: A total of 96 participants (median age 69 y, IQR 65-72 y; n=63, 65.6% female) were assigned to 4 groups: physical (n=12), cognitive (n=23), combined (n=43), and control (n=18). Global cognitive performance was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at baseline and postintervention. Mixed ANOVA examined time and time × group effects. Additional nonparametric analyses (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank tests) were conducted under intention-to-treat and per-protocol (PP) frameworks. Adherence was defined as attending 50% or more of scheduled sessions, with PP analyses reclassifying participants accordingly. Results: Global cognition improved significantly over time across all groups (time main effect: F1,92=7.03, P=.008; time × group interaction: F3,92=0.57, P=.64). PP analyses showed moderate gains for participants attending 50% or more of cognitive sessions (r=0.46) and larger gains for those adhering to the combined intervention (r=0.66), with median Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores increasing by approximately 2 points in both adherent groups. Subdomain analyses indicated improvements in language (all groups), visuospatial function (combined group), and orientation (cognitive group). Conclusions: All intervention types were associated with improvements in cognitive performance over time, with comparable gains across groups. Participants who achieved at least moderate adherence (≥50%) to the cognitive or combined interventions demonstrated larger and more consistent within-group effect sizes, highlighting the importance of sustained engagement. These findings support the feasibility and potential cognitive benefits of structured, multimodal nonpharmacological interventions for community-dwelling older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.