ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Effects of Abrasive Flow Finishing on the Surface Quality, Frictional Resistance, and Biological Performance of Brackets.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to investigate the effects of abrasive flow finishing (AFF) on the surface quality, frictional resistance, and biological performance of orthodontic brackets.
methodsStainless-steel brackets were randomly allocated into blank, control, and AFF groups. The blank group was left untreated. The control group underwent conventional magnetic polishing, while the AFF group was treated with AFF. Surface morphology was observed using scanning electron microscopy. Surface roughness at the micro- and nanoscale was investigated via 3D optical profilometry and atomic force microscopy, respectively. The arithmetic average roughness (Ra) and root mean square roughness (Rq) were analysed. The changes in slot dimensions were evaluated. Frictional resistance was determined using a universal testing machine. Biological performance was evaluated via bacterial adhesion and in vitro calculus formation assays.
resultsThe AFF group presented a mirror-like finish. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs exhibited the smooth and uniform surface in outer and slot areas in the AFF group, while the control group showed obvious defects and pits within slots. 3D optical profilometry and atomic force microscopy demonstrated the smooth and regular surface topography in the AFF group. Quantitative analysis showed that Ra and Rq values of the slot area in the AFF group were significantly lower than those of blank and control groups. There were no significant changes in slot dimensions following AFF treatment. The kinetic friction force was significantly reduced in the AFF group. Furthermore, AFF treatment inhibited bacterial adhesion and calculus-like mineral deposition on brackets.
conclusionAFF treatment effectively reduced the surface roughness of orthodontic brackets, especially within slot area, outperforming conventional magnetic polishing. This improvement further minimized frictional resistance and inhibited bacterial adhesion and calculus-like mineral deposition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that AFF is a superior post-processing technique for orthodontic brackets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.