ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Brain structural-functional connectivity coupling and glucose metabolism in adolescents with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore potential neuroimaging features derived from [ MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients were grouped based on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hypomania Check List (HCL), and the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior was assessed. 14 BD and 14 MDD adolescent patients were enrolled. Simultaneous PET and MRI data (including 3D T1-weighted imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI)) were acquired. Functional connectivity (FC) and structural connectivity (SC) were derived from fMRI and DTI respectively. A multiple linear regression model was employed to predict FC from SC. SC-FC coupling was defined as Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted FC and original FC. Using cerebellar gray matter uptake as reference region, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) of each brain region was calculated as metabolic parameter.
resultsCompared with the MDD group, the BD group showed significantly decreased SC-FC coupling and glucose metabolism in the thalamus. In the BD group, SC-FC coupling in the paracentral lobule showed a significant positive correlation with metabolism (r = 0.70). In the MDD group, SC-FC coupling in cingulate gyrus showed a significant negative correlation with metabolism (r=-0.73). In the BD group, SC-FC coupling in superior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus, and precentral gyrus correlated significantly with HAMD, HCL, and suicide scores, respectively. In the MDD group, SC-FC coupling in precentral gyrus, orbital gyrus, and hippocampus showed the highest correlations with these clinical indicators. The middle temporal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus were specifically associated with suicide scores in the BD group. Notable intergroup differences between BD and MDD were thalamus (AUC = 0.86) and inferior temporal gyrus (AUC = 0.76), with SC-FC coupling features in these regions showing more prominent differences than metabolic features.
conclusionThis study identifies the thalamus as a key region in adolescent BD. Differences in SC-FC coupling in thalamus and inferior temporal gyrus reflect notable exploratory features between adolescent BD and MDD patients, suggesting that SC-FC coupling parameters may represent potential neuroimaging signatures for differential diagnosis. The differences in correlations among SC-FC coupling, metabolism, and clinical parameters between the groups indicate distinct pathogenic mechanisms for BD and MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42399489What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.