ReviewHerz2026
[Advancing cardiovascular prevention : Evidence-based design of healthy and sustainable food environments].
Review in Herz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition is among the leading modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases worldwide. Current international guidelines consistently recommend predominantly plant-based dietary patterns rich in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes and unsaturated fats. At the same time, the diet affects not only individual health but also the ecological foundations of future health. The nutrition system substantially contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, land-use change and freshwater consumption. This article argues that nutrition should therefore be understood as a dual lever for prevention: both for reducing cardiovascular disease and for stabilizing health-relevant ecological systems. While evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefits of high-quality plant-based diets continues to grow, implementation at the population level remains insufficient. The article discusses the limited long-term effectiveness of purely educational and individual responsibility-focused approaches and contrasts these with the more consistent evidence supporting structural interventions. In particular, fiscal policies, restrictions on unhealthy food marketing, healthy food standards in public institutions and modifications of food environments have demonstrated robust effects on dietary behavior and health outcomes. Against this background an expansion of cardiovascular prevention towards the active shaping of healthy and sustainable food environments is proposed. Physicians and medical societies could play a substantially stronger role in advocating evidence-based structural prevention policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42399496What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.