Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399583›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Melanoma Prognosis and Therapy.

Isabel Heidrich, Sarah Urhahn, Christoffer Gebhardt, Daniel J Smit, Klaus Pantel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel HeidrichInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah UrhahnDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoffer GebhardtDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Daniel J Smit *Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus Pantel *Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. pantel@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With more than 300,000 new cases diagnosed in 2022 and a projected rise in incidence until the year 2040, malignant melanoma remains a major global health challenge. Of note, immunotherapy has substantially improved survival outcomes, even in advanced stages. Nevertheless, reliable biomarkers for early relapse detection, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring remain an unmet clinical need. Conventional surveillance tools, including imaging, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and S100B, are limited by their sensitivity and specificity, particularly in patients with low tumor burden. The use of liquid biopsy, the analysis of body fluids such as blood, with its wide range of analytes and highly sensitive analysis methods, may represent a novel strategy to overcome the limitations of conventional biomarkers. In particular, the analysis of circulating cell-free nucleic acids from the tumor released to the blood, referred to as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has emerged as a minimally invasive approach capable of capturing tumor-derived molecular information from plasma in solid tumors. ctDNA holds promise as a tool for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), early relapse, clonal evolution, and actionable genomic alterations. Technological advances have expanded ctDNA applications from single-mutation assays to comprehensive personalized NGS strategies and multi-modal approaches incorporating methylation profiling and fragmentomics. Clinical studies increasingly demonstrate that ctDNA detection and ctDNA dynamics provide prognostic and potentially predictive information across both (neo)adjuvant and advanced melanoma settings. In this review, we summarize the current methodological approaches and clinical evidence supporting ctDNA as a biomarker for prognosis, risk stratification, and therapy monitoring in melanoma.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSkin NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID42399583
PMCPMC13578026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.