ReviewNature medicine2026
Immune aging biomarkers for clinical trials.
Review in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging profoundly remodels the immune system, impairing defense, repair and homeostatic function across tissues. Because the immune system operates in every organ, its deterioration has been proposed to drive or exacerbate systemic dysfunction and accelerate overall biological aging, making it an attractive biomarker and target for geroscience-guided trials. Despite this central role, there is no consensus on how to quantify immune aging, especially in clinical trials. Here, we establish a translational framework to identify immune aging biomarkers for this purpose. We define five evaluation criteria for immune aging biomarkers and apply these to candidate biomarkers, discussing their utility in the context of a major international healthspan competition, XPRIZE Healthspan. Metrics encapsulating multidimensional aspects of immune function, inflammaging scores and functional assays performed best against our selection criteria. Finally, we identify promising emerging measures, together with critical gaps that must be addressed to develop reliable, predictive biomarkers of human immune competence. Our framework provides a coherent path toward actionable and clinically meaningful immune aging biomarkers capable of quantifying immune fitness and resilience, and accelerating the clinical translation of geroscience-guided interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42399672What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.