ArticleBMC cancer2026
Benefits and challenges of adding BKM120 to a BI-3406 plus trametinib combination therapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving a balance between efficacy and side effects is essential for the success of new combinatorial cancer therapies. This study investigated the impact of adding BKM120, a PI3K inhibitor, to a dual regimen consisting of BI-3406, a KRAS/SOS1 inhibitor, and trametinib, a MEK inhibitor.
methodsThe therapeutic effects of these drug combinations were evaluated in the pancreatic cancer cell line 6606PDA using both monolayer and three-dimensional cultures. Additionally, their efficacy and potential side effects were assessed in vivo using a syngeneic orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.
resultsIn vitro studies demonstrated that the addition of BKM120 to BI-3406 and trametinib significantly reduced cell viability in both monolayer and three-dimensional cultures. However, in a syngeneic pancreatic cancer mouse model, the triple therapy failed to significantly improve survival outcome compared to the dual therapy. Tumor weights were unaffected in female mice, while a minor, non-significant reduction was observed in male mice. This was accompanied by a slight, non-significant decrease in cancer cell proliferation. In the triple therapy group, Cdkn2a expression in tumors, a marker for senescence, remained largely unchanged. However, PD-L1 was significantly reduced in males, and CD8
conclusionThe addition of BKM120 to the combination of BI-3406 and trametinib provides minimal therapeutic benefit while introducing significant adverse effects, underscoring the need for caution when considering clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.