ArticleBMC public health2026
Assessment of hepatitis B and tetanus toxoid vaccination coverage and associated factors among healthcare workers at Kabul University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals in Afghanistan.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHepatitis B and tetanus remain significant public health challenges in Afghanistan, a developing country where vaccination coverage is suboptimal. Healthcare workers are particularly at risk due to their exposure to infected blood and bodily fluids, and they play a vital role as health role models; however, their vaccination rates for hepatitis B and tetanus are often inadequate, risking both their health and potential transmission to patients. This study aimed to assess the vaccination coverage and associated factors among health personnel in teaching hospitals affiliated with Kabul University of Medical Sciences, providing insights to inform strategies for improving immunization practices and occupational safety.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at three teaching hospitals affiliated with Kabul University of Medical Sciences. The study sample included medical personnel (physicians, nurses, midwives, laboratory technicians, and other clinical staff) actively engaged in patient care with direct exposure to blood or bodily secretions. Demographic and vaccination information were gathered from them using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using Stata version 18.0.
resultsA total of 284 professional staff members from the three teaching hospitals of Kabul University of Medical Sciences participated in this study from 20 December 2024 to 20 March 2025. The majority were male (52.8%), with ages ranging from 19 to 62 years. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage was 57.8% (full) and 67.3% (partial or full); tetanus toxoid vaccination coverage was 45.5% (full) and 49.3% (partial or full). Factors associated with hepatitis B vaccination included profession and work experience. Tetanus vaccination was strongly associated with gender and profession, with a trend toward higher odds among those with higher income. The most commonly cited reason for non-vaccination was lack of access (48.4%), including geographical barriers, unavailability of vaccines at health facilities, and cost.
conclusionHepatitis B and tetanus vaccination coverage among healthcare workers in Kabul was suboptimal but comparable to that reported in other developing countries, with distinct factors driving uptake for each vaccine. Despite near-universal positive attitudes toward vaccination, the primary barrier was lack of access, highlighting systemic gaps in occupational health services. Institutional vaccination programs with free, on-site access are needed to protect healthcare workers and their patients. Further studies with larger samples across diverse settings are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.