ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Mitochondrial COI and 16S rDNA barcoding improve species delimitation of ixodid ticks in Peninsular Malaysia.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are major vectors of zoonotic pathogens affecting humans and animals. Accurate species identification is essential for surveillance and disease risk assessment but is often hindered by morphological similarity and intraspecific variation. In Malaysia, tick studies have largely relied on morphology or single-gene barcoding, with limited taxonomic and geographic coverage.
methodsThis study applied a multilocus mitochondrial approach using cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to evaluate species boundaries among ixodid ticks from Peninsular Malaysia. Ticks were collected from wild and domestic hosts between 2022 and 2023. A total of 319 specimens representing 14 morphologically defined species were analysed using COI and 16S rDNA sequencing, with additional reference sequences retrieved from GenBank for comparative analyses. Phylogenetic reconstruction, barcode gap assessment, and four species delimitation methods (ASAP, ABGD, bPTP, and GMYC) were employed to assess genetic divergence and identification accuracy.
resultsMolecular analyses were largely congruent with morphological identification. Distance-based delimitation methods (ASAP and ABGD) recovered operational taxonomic units (OTUs) largely consistent with morphologically defined species, whereas tree-based approaches (bPTP and GMYC) inferred substantially higher numbers of OTUs, reflecting sensitivity to intraspecific mitochondrial structuring. These additional subdivisions are interpreted conservatively as population-level genetic differentiation rather than evidence of distinct species. Clear barcode gaps were observed for COI and the concatenated COI + 16S rDNA datasets, whereas partial overlap occurred with 16S rDNA alone. COI demonstrated the highest and most consistent performance for routine species identification, while concatenated datasets improved phylogenetic resolution but reduced assignment clarity under strict barcoding criteria.
conclusionsOverall, COI remains the most effective mitochondrial marker for routine species identification of ixodid ticks in Peninsular Malaysia. These findings highlight the value of integrative approaches combining morphology and molecular data to strengthen tick taxonomy and support surveillance of tick-borne pathogens in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.