Evidence mapPaperPMID 42400121Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2026

Hearing Loss and Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older Living in Tasmania, Australia.

Mohammad Shoaib Hamrah, Kathleen Doherty, Aidan Bindoff, Lynette R Goldberg, Jane Alty, Alex Kitsos, Eddy Roccati, Claire Eccleston, Anna King, Thomas Gregor Issac and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammad Shoaib HamrahWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-8341
Kathleen DohertyWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-0123
Aidan BindoffWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Lynette R GoldbergWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8217-317X
Jane AltyWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Alex KitsosWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Eddy RoccatiWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Claire EcclestonWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Anna KingWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Thomas Gregor IssacCentre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Hiroshi YatsuyaDepartment of Public Health and Health System, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
James Clement VickersWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the associations between hearing loss (HL) and other modifiable dementia risk factors in adults aged 50 years or older living in Tasmania and explored the effects of corrected versus uncorrected HL on these factors.

methodsA cross-sectional study design using an online survey categorised participants as No-HL, HL-corrected or HL-uncorrected. Logistic regression estimated the odds of being in higher dementia risk categories.

resultsThe HL-corrected group was more likely to be in the low-risk alcohol group (OR = 0.567, 95% CI: 0.468-0.687), 28% less likely for high cholesterol (OR = 0.722, 95% CI: 0.571-0.913) and 26% less likely for diabetes (OR = 0.743, 95% CI: 0.582-0.948). They also had lower odds than the HL-uncorrected group for alcohol risk (OR = 0.652, 95% CI: 0.508-0.837).

conclusionsCorrected HL is associated with reduced odds of higher-risk categories for diabetes, alcohol use and high cholesterol.

Indexed as

DementiaHearingHearing LossPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypercholesterolemiaLogistic ModelsMaleAustraliadementiahearing lossrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42400121
PMCPMC13332113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.