ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Achieving Targeted Combined Endpoints in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Study.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-world evidence on the treat-to-target strategy in atopic dermatitis (AD) remains limited. To evaluate targeted combined endpoints in AD, we conducted a cross-sectional study that included 100 adults with AD receiving treatment ≥ 6 months. Targeted endpoints included Patient Global Assessment (PGA) ≤ 2, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 7, visual analog scale (VAS) of pruritus ≤ 4, Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) ≤ 7, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify factors associated with achieving treatment targets. Latent class analysis (LCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed to identify patient subgroups and data components. Only 30% met all five targeted endpoints. An increased age was associated with a higher probability of achieving all treatment targets (aOR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.09). DLQI could favorably predict the achievement of all 5 treatment targets (AUROC: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.97). Despite no significant differences across treatment groups, the proportion of patients achieving all targets was the highest in the dupilumab group, followed by the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) group. LCA identified one subgroup of patients achieving favorable skin control but poor life quality. PCA showed that life quality-related factors other than the severity of skin lesions explained the majority of variance. In conclusion, achievement of targeted combined endpoints in AD remains suboptimal, partly due to life quality-related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.