ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus evidence from Asia countries: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic complication of pregnancy associated with substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity. Asian populations demonstrate increased susceptibility to glucose intolerance and may develop gestational diabetes earlier in pregnancy. However, the prevalence and outcomes of early-diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus (E-GDM) in Asian populations remain incompletely understood.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to February 2026 to identify studies evaluating gestational diabetes diagnosed before 24 weeks of gestation in Asian populations.
resultsA total of 2329 records were identified, and 17 studies were included, with 16 eligible studies for meta-analysis. E-GDM prevalence ranged from 0.75% to 22.81%, accounting for 9.43%-78.78% of total GDM cases. Compared with conventional GDM, E-GDM was associated with increased risks of C-section or instrumental delivery (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26), preterm birth (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.78), and insulin therapy requirement (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.36). Most neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. Women with E-GDM showed greater metabolic vulnerability and possible postpartum metabolic dysfunction.
conclusionsE-GDM in Asian populations identifies women with greater metabolic vulnerability and increased obstetric risk. E-GDM was associated with higher insulin requirements, increased risks of preterm birth and operative delivery, and possible long-term metabolic dysfunction. Harmonized diagnostic criteria and region-specific screening strategies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.