Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Evaluating current bronchiectasis care in Italy according to the 2025 European respiratory society recommendations.
Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNational quality standards for bronchiectasis in Italy were last defined in 2016. The publication of the 2025 European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines offers the opportunity to evaluate current clinical practice against updated evidence-based recommendations.
objectivesTo assess the extent to which Italian bronchiectasis centers align with key statements from the 2025 ERS guidelines.
designNational, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study based on a structured survey of Italian bronchiectasis centers, aligned with the 2025 ERS recommendations.
methodsA national survey was conducted across Italian bronchiectasis centers affiliated with the Italian Bronchiectasis Patient Association (AIB). The structured questionnaire assessed center organization, diagnostic resources, multidisciplinary care, and alignment with ten predefined core management domains derived from the 2025 ERS recommendations.
resultsMost centers reported universal access to minimum bundle etiological tests, with improved capacity compared with 2016. However, specialized diagnostics for rare causes, structured physiotherapy programs, and written self-management plans remain inconsistently available. Long-term inhaled antibiotics and macrolides were widely prescribed, though access barriers persist. Monitoring practices were heterogeneous.
conclusionDespite clear progress, substantial variability persists in physiotherapy access, rare disease diagnostics, self-management tools, and routine monitoring. Updated Italian quality standards aligned with ERS 2025 principles are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.