Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400398›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuropsychology2026

The hijacked insula: A stratified model of affective touch modulation in chronic pain.

Efterpi Maria Palamoutsi, Giulia Liberati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Efterpi Maria PalamoutsiInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3926-7058
Giulia LiberatiInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain involves maladaptive plasticity of the insular cortex, a key hub for both pain and affective touch. While C-tactile (CT) afferent stimulation shows analgesic potential, its efficacy is limited by altered touch processing in chronic pain populations. This review integrates neuroimaging and behavioural evidence to propose a novel, stratified therapeutic framework targeting the insula. A narrative review of PubMed and Scopus was performed. Two literature streams were synthesized: (1) neuroimaging studies characterizing structural and functional insular abnormalities in chronic pain and (2) studies examining behavioural and neural responses to affective touch in chronic pain populations. The synthesis identifies a core 'dysfunctional insula' phenotype marked by structural atrophy, persistent hyperactivity and reorganized network connectivity (e.g. salience, default mode). This is paralleled by altered affective touch processing, often manifesting as anhedonia. Neuroimaging supports a 'neural hijacking' model, where insular activity during gentle touch decouples from pleasantness and instead correlates with pain-related metrics. Critically, findings are heterogeneous: some cohorts retain hedonic discrimination, suggesting the underlying neural circuits are suppressed rather than permanently damaged. We propose a stratified model where CT-based interventions are personalized to a patient's neurofunctional phenotype: either by normalizing 'hijacked' pain-related circuits or by strengthening intact hedonic pathways. This approach moves beyond a one-size-fits-all strategy, establishing the insula as a nuanced target for personalized, non-pharmacological pain therapies.

Indexed as

AffectChronic PainInsular CortexNeuronal PlasticityTouchTouch PerceptionHumansaffective touchchronic painC‐tactile systeminsular cortexInteroceptionneuroplasticitypain modulationsalience network

Identifiers

PMID42400398
PMCPMC13552250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.