Evidence mapPaperPMID 42400613Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2026

Computational intelligence using nailfold videocapillaroscopy for the prediction of carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort-based study.

Danial J Armaghani, Elena Angeloudi, Amir H Gandomi, Panagiota Anyfanti, Eleni Gavriilaki, Stergios Soulaidopoulos, Eleni Pagkopoulou, Michael Doumas, George D Kitas, Ahmed G Gad and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Danial J ArmaghaniSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. danial.jahedarmaghani@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-6403
Elena Angeloudi3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. angeloudi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-7915
Amir H GandomiFaculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2798-0104
Panagiota Anyfanti3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-4629
Eleni Gavriilaki2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8883-8208
Stergios SoulaidopoulosFirst Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School of Athens University, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-5286
Eleni PagkopoulouFourth Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-1538
Michael Doumas2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-8044
George D KitasThe Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-6176
Ahmed G GadFaculty of Computers and Information, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-041X
Sanjog Chhetri SapkotaNepal Research and Collaboration Center, Bhakti Thapa Sadak, Baneshwor, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-5679
Georgios A DrosopoulosInternational Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6321
Konstantina V LeontariNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieio Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0088-0775
Markos Z TsoukalasComputational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-7277
Leonidas TriantafyllidisComputational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0896-3201
Ahmed Salih MohammedCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan-Region, Iraq.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-3274
Abidhan BardhanCivil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-5709
Pijush SamuiCivil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-8718
Gai-Ge WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-8972
Panagiotis G AsterisComputational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Athens, Greece. panagiotisasteris@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-4981
Theodoros DimitroulasFourth Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite continuously evolving medical advances, CVD risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) remains paradoxically high to date. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a widely used surrogate marker for atherosclerosis. However, issues related to operator-dependent assessment, availability and cost of carotid ultrasound are barriers to its wide implementation as an aid to cardiovascular risk assessment in RA. We aimed to develop a computational artificial intelligence (AI) model for cIMT prediction in RA. The recently proposed DERGA algorithm (Data Ensemble Refinement Greedy Algorithm) was employed in a database of datasets from 101 patients with RA, utilizing information on a wide range of clinical and laboratory variables, classical cardiovascular risk factors, disease-related parameters, and vascular assessments obtained with nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC). A total of 13,917,800 models were designed and trained. Among the four evaluated regression metaheuristic algorithms, the best predictive performance was achieved by the DERGA-Extra Trees model. The optimal model utilized only 8 of the 52 available input variables, while maintaining excellent predictive accuracy. Eventually, the 8 most important parameters predicting cIMT, listed from the most influential to the least influential, were white blood count, age, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, capillary density, systolic blood pressure, microhemorrhages, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, and methotrexate. A very strong positive linear correlation was observed between predicted and actual (measured) cIMT values (R = 0.9843), supporting the high predictive capability of the proposed computational intelligence model. Pending external validation in larger cohorts, the findings of the present study should be considered preliminary. Nevertheless, they provide further evidencesupporting the potential utility of AI applications for the assessment of subclinical vascular involvement in RA. While the role of NVC as an indicator of cardiovascular health is beginning to unfold, these findings underscore its promise as an adjunctive modality to facilitate more effective CVD risk stratification in RA.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidArtificial IntelligenceCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessMicroscopic AngioscopyNailsAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular riskCarotid intima media thicknessComputational intelligenceMachine learningNailfold videocapillaroscopyPrediction modelRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID42400613
PMCPMC13332994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.