Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400636›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2026

Bibliometric analysis of enthesis research: a comprehensive review from 1999 to 2024.

Aleksey Lychagin, Ivan Lychagin, Yulia Goncharuk, Ivan Vyazankin, Vadim Cherepanov, Tagir Kudrachev, Anastasia Kostysheva, Berardo Di Matteo, Elizaveta Kon, Eugene Kalinsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aleksey LychaginDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ivan LychaginDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Yulia GoncharukDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ivan VyazankinDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Vadim CherepanovDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Tagir KudrachevDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastasia KostyshevaDepartment of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Berardo Di MatteoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. berardo.dimatteo@gmail.com.
Elizaveta KonIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Eugene KalinskyDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present bibliometric analysis of the literature concerning the bone-tendon interface aims at identifying the past and new trends of research in this specific field under both the rheumatic orthopaedic point of view.

methodsThe bibliometric analysis of the bone-tendon interface was conducted using the Scopus online platform with a search period of 1999 to 2024. There were three research steps, and 5 773 articles included in the research. The data was analyzed using Bibliometrix online analytics platform and VOS viewer application.

resultsA total of 4,747 articles met the inclusion criteria and were amenable to analysis. The number of published articles has been steadily growing for 26 years with two peaks of interest. The United States is the leader in total amount of international and local publications. Among the institutions researching on enthesis, the University of Toronto (Canada, Toronto) has published the largest number of articles. There is a steady trend towards studying the possibility of using new cellular and cell-free technologies in the treatment of pathologies.

conclusionOver the past 26 years, the number of published articles on the subject of enthesis has steadily increased, reaching a peak in activity in 2022. The present research also highlighted that researchers are currently focusing on the possibility of using regenerative technologies, in particular exosomes, in the treatment of enthesis pathologies.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyBone-tendon interfaceEnthesisReviewTendon

Identifiers

PMID42400636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.