Evidence mapPaperPMID 42400638Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2026

Next Generation Probiotics Challenges: A Road to use as Live Bio-Therapeutics.

Hannan Rashid And, Arsalan Zaidi, Hannan Rashid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannan Rashid AndDept of Biotechnology, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Arsalan ZaidiDept of Biotechnology, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hannan RashidDept of Biotechnology, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan. hannanrashid@nibge.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an eminent association between human gut microbiota and health. The eventual footprint on the host depends heavily on the symbiotic relationship between the host and their gut microbiota. Current probiotics mostly available to consumers are drawn from a restricted arsenal of organisms, mostly belongs to various genera of Lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Ever expanding knowledge of gut microbiota and its related constituents is shifting this paradigm, specifically the phylogenetic range and the obscure characteristics of novel biotherapeutics currently under consideration. Due to this, and because their progress is more complaint to a pharmaceutical route with sole purpose of mitigating chronic ailments, rather than a food delivery as they are not designed for conventional use as food or dietary supplements, these microorganisms are repeatedly mentioned as Next Generation Probiotics (NGPs), a notion that coincides with the juvenile concept of live biotherapeutic products. Various nonconventional strains showing probiotic potential includes Akkermansia muciniphila, Prevotella copri, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium halii, members of Clostridia cluster IV and XIV and Bacteroides fragilis. However, major challenge hindering their way to the market is viable intestinal delivery due to stringent survival conditions. In this review, present day outlook on the development and valuation of these strains are covered, along with suggested approaches which stakeholders and industries should consider for better outcomes.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42400638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.