ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Stem cell-based regenerative therapies for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: mechanistic insights, clinical evidence, and future directions.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) includes a wide spectrum of myocardial disorders that result in ventricular dysfunction in the absence of significant coronary artery disease. The currently available treatments are primarily palliative in nature as they are not able to restore damaged cardiomyocytes or reverse structural damage. Stem cell-based regenerative methods show a potential therapeutic solution as instead of providing symptomatic benefits they are aimed at targeting the underlying cause. It has been observed in preclinical studies that the different types of stem cells act through immunomodulation, paracrine signaling, antifibrotic effects, and promoting angiogenesis rather than through direct action on cardiomyocytes. The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, functional capacity, and quality of life parameters observed in early-phase clinical trials for NICM show inconsistent results primarily due to heterogeneity in study design, type of stem cells, delivery methods, and patient selection. The main limitations include poor engraftment, heterogeneity of outcomes, and long-term safety concerns, particularly arrhythmogenic potential and tumorigenesis in pluripotent cell-based approaches. The advancements in genetic engineering, extracellular vesicle therapy, and combined cell-gene strategies are expanding the horizons of therapeutic potential of stem cells. This review synthesizes current evidence, highlights translational challenges, and explores emerging directions, including biomaterial-assisted delivery and precision medicine-based patient stratification, which may enable stem cell therapies to become a viable adjunct in managing NICM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42400700What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.