ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026
Metabolic phenotypes of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity among patients with breast cancer.
Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDoxorubicin (DOX)-based chemotherapy has improved survival outcomes in breast cancer patients but is often limited by doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC). Currently, no validated biomarkers can predict early DIC. Identifying novel biomarkers is essential for detecting patients at higher risk and enable timely interventions before irreversible cardiac injury occurs.
methodsTwenty-seven breast cancer patients treated with DOX-containing chemotherapy were stratified by change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 19 patients who maintained normal cardiac function (normal, decline < 10%) and 8 who developed cardiotoxicity (abnormal, decline > 10%). Plasma samples were collected at baseline and after chemotherapy for untargeted metabolomic profiling. Both baseline and pre-post designs were employed to capture static and dynamic metabolic alterations associated with DIC. Stepwise logistic regression was used to filter non-informative metabolites, and predictive performance was further validated using Random Forest modeling.
resultsA well-marked separation of plasma metabolomic profiles was observed between normal and abnormal cardiotoxicity groups at baseline (T0). Statistical analysis identified 100 significant metabolites at baseline (T0) and 78 metabolites after the first cycle of chemotherapy (T0-T1), with 10 metabolites common to both time-points: 3-phosphoglycerate, 2-hydroxyphenylacetate, inosine, taurine, suberate (C8-DC), sebacate (C10-DC), sphingadienine, oxindolylalanine. Machine learning models identified key metabolites (e.g., sebacate [C10-DC], 2-hydroxyhippurate, orotate, picolinate, and suberate [C8-DC]) as candidate predictors of cardiotoxicity, achieving moderate discriminatory performance in cross-validation, with higher specificity than sensitivity, indicating limited detection of abnormal cases.
conclusionsMetabolomic profiling shows potential for early detection of DIC in breast cancer patients, supporting personalized interventions to prevent irreversible cardiac damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.