ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
General practitioners' perceptions and experiences of knee osteoarthritis management: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to delivering guideline-recommended treatments.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition and public health concern. Guidelines recommend non-surgical treatments - such as education, exercise and weight management - as core elements of OA management; however, uptake remains low. General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in delivery, yet little is known about how GPs navigate OA treatments in the Scandinavian context.
aimTo explore Danish GPs' perceptions and experiences of knee OA management, focusing on treatments and referral, and to identify key barriers and facilitators to delivering guideline-recommended treatments.
methodsTwelve semi-structured online interviews were conducted with GPs and GP trainees. Participants were recruited through a combination of convenience and self-selection sampling. Data were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) knowledge and practice extend beyond guidelines, (2) non-surgical treatments are limited and inconsistently provided, (3) conceptual and relational tensions are negotiated and (4) fostering patient motivation is challenging.
conclusionGPs displayed generally up-to-date knowledge of core non-surgical treatments, although familiarity with referral criteria was more variable. They held positive attitudes toward exercise and physiotherapy-led treatment, but experienced limited active dissemination of guidelines. Structural barriers, including fragmented pathways and uneven municipal services limited delivery of non-surgical treatments. Weight loss was viewed as effective in relieving joint pain but an unsustainable treatment focus, highlighting the need for a feasible, weight-inclusive approach to weight management. Strengthening cross-sector coordination, developing and implementing multidisciplinary OA services as well as clarifying where responsibility for fostering patient motivation should be placed, may enhance delivery of non-surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.