ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived challenges toward artificial intelligence applications in patient care: a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare systems; however, nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived challenges play a crucial role in its adoption in patient care. This study aimed to assess nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived challenges toward AI, examine the relationships among these variables, and explore their associations with demographic characteristics and prior AI training.
methodsA descriptive analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 107 nurses working in intensive care, medical, and surgical units at Zagazig University Hospital. A purposive sampling technique was used. Data were collected over two months using structured instruments during morning shifts.
resultsMost participants were aged 25-34 years (55.1%), male (65.4%; reflecting the accessible sample composition), and held bachelor's degrees (68.2%), with nearly half (49.5%) having 5-10 years of clinical experience. Overall, 68.2% of nurses achieved satisfactory knowledge scores, whereas 88.8% demonstrated positive attitudes toward AI applications. Perceived challenges were mainly related to technical and ethical concerns, particularly the need for continuous system updates, cybersecurity risks, and implementation costs. A statistically significant weak negative correlation was found between nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward AI (r = -0.195, p = 0.044). No significant correlations were observed between knowledge and perceived challenges (r = -0.162, p = 0.095) or between attitudes and perceived challenges (r = 0.142, p = 0.145). Previous AI-related training was significantly associated with more positive attitudes toward AI (p = 0.019), whereas no significant associations were found with knowledge or perceived challenges. Educational level, workplace, and years of experience were not significantly associated with nurses' knowledge, attitudes, or perceived challenges.
conclusionNurses demonstrated a satisfactory knowledge and generally positive attitudes toward AI applications in patient care, while perceiving moderate implementation challenges. Although previous AI-related training was associated with more positive attitudes, no significant associations were found with knowledge or perceived challenges. The weak negative correlation between knowledge and attitudes suggests that greater awareness of AI may be accompanied by increased concerns regarding its use. Further educational initiatives are needed to enhance nurses' preparedness for AI integration in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.