ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026
Traditional medicinal bath plants along the Beibu Gulf coast of Guangxi, China.
Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedicinal baths are a widely practiced traditional health maintenance method in southern China, yet systematic ethnobotanical studies from coastal regions remain limited. The Beibu Gulf coastal area of Guangxi is a biologically and culturally diverse region where such practices are actively maintained. This study aims to document the plant species used in traditional medicinal baths and to characterize their composition, usage patterns, and regional variation.
methodsEthnobotanical interviews were conducted at 20 sites across Beihai, Qinzhou, and Fangchenggang City, which comprise the Beibu Gulf. A total of 135 informants (62 males and 73 females) were interviewed in medicinal markets and traditional villages. Data on plant species, plant parts used, and medicinal applications were recorded. Quantitative analyses, including Jaccard Index (JI), cumulative contribution analysis, and Gini coefficient, were applied to assess species similarity and usage patterns.
resultsA total of 286 plant species used for medicinal baths were recorded. These plants belong to 92 families and 218 genera. Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Rubiaceae, and Asteraceae were the dominant families, with monotypic genera prevalent. Herbs were the most common life form (99 species, 34.62%). Branches, leaves, and whole plants accounted for 71.66% of use. The main applications of these plants in medicinal bath practices were for traumatic injuries, rheumatic diseases, and skin conditions (58.50%). Species richness was highest in Fangchenggang (249 species), followed by Qinzhou (238) and Beihai (144), with 133 shared species. Higher similarity was observed between Fangchenggang and Qinzhou (JI = 0.72). The top 10, 20, 30, 50, and 100 species contributed 10.24%, 18.16%, 25.10%, 37.47%, and 62.25% of total usage frequency, respectively, with a Gini coefficient of 0.383.
conclusionsThe medicinal bath plant system in the Beibu Gulf coastal region is characterized by high species richness and a balanced structure of commonly used and supplementary species. While a shared core flora exists, local differences among cities in the Beibu Gulf are also evident. This study provides comprehensive ethnobotanical data from southern coastal China and offers a regional case for understanding plant selection and functional convergence in medicinal bath practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.