ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2026
Temporal dynamics of cardiac biomarkers in therapy‑related cardiotoxicity: a prospective cardio‑oncology cohort study.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiotoxicity associated with antineoplastic therapies remains an important clinical challenge in modern oncology. Early identification of subclinical cardiac injury may improve cardiovascular surveillance and long-term outcomes in cancer patients.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study included 90 adult patients with breast cancer, lymphoma, or lung cancer receiving potentially cardiotoxic therapy. Patients with clinically manifest heart failure, severe arrhythmias, advanced renal disease, recent acute myocardial infarction, untreated severe valvular disease, or other major cardiovascular comorbidities were excluded. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), NT-proBNP, and soluble ST2 (sST2) were measured at baseline, during treatment, at therapy completion, and at late follow-up. Non-parametric tests were used for repeated-measures and subgroup comparisons.
resultsSignificant temporal variations were observed for all biomarkers. hs-cTnT increased from 5 [3-8] ng/L at baseline to 15 [10-25] ng/L at T2, while NT-proBNP increased from 120 [80-190] pg/mL to 210 [150-320] pg/mL. sST2 demonstrated a delayed elevation and remained increased at follow-up. Distinct biomarker patterns were observed across malignancy subgroups, with higher hs-cTnT increases in breast cancer, more prominent NT-proBNP elevation in lymphoma, and higher sST2 values in lung cancer.
conclusionsSerial biomarker assessment may provide complementary information on myocardial injury, ventricular stress, and fibrotic remodeling during cancer therapy. The observed biomarker trajectories are suggestive of different biological processes involved in therapy-related cardiotoxicity, but they should be interpreted in conjunction with imaging findings and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.