Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2026
Fasting-induced glucose intolerance is not impacted by the addition of daily exercise: A randomized crossover study.
Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short-term fasting (48-72 h) impairs insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, but it is unclear if aerobic exercise - which is known to have insulin-sensitizing effects - can attenuate fasting-induced decrements in glucose homeostasis. To determine whether the addition of exercise to a short-term fast impacts glycaemic responses to refeeding, we implemented a randomized crossover design where 16 healthy adults (8 males and 8 females, 24±4 years) fasted for 48 h with and without the addition of daily cycling (50-min moderate-intensity continuous training + 5×1-min high-intensity interval training) performed at baseline and 24 h into the fast. Glycaemic responses to a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) were assessed via capillary measurements and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before and after the fast, as well as 24 h after refeeding. Capillary glucose and CGM incremental area under the curve (iAUC) during the 2-h mixed meal tolerance test increased at 48 h fasted relative to baseline (P<0.001), which was unaffected by the addition of exercise (condition × time interaction, P>0.364). The 2-h CGM iAUC reduced 24 h after refeeding compared to 48 h fasted (with or without exercise, P<0.001) but remained elevated relative to baseline (P = 0.01). Exploratory analyses revealed that 2-h capillary (P = 0.020) and CGM (P<0.001) glucose iAUC and plasma glucose (P<0.001) were elevated to a greater extent after refeeding in females compared to males, and females exhibited greater impairments in CGM metrics in the 24 h after refeeding (P<0.01). Our results suggest that combined moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training exercise does not attenuate fasting-induced perturbations in glucose homeostasis and that glucose intolerance persists 24 h after refeeding. KEY POINTS: Short-term fasting reduces insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, which manifests as exaggerated glycaemic responses to refeeding. Performing exercise during a fast could mitigate fasting-induced glucose intolerance, due to the well-established insulin-sensitizing effects of acute exercise. Here we report that a 48-h fast performed with or without the addition of daily aerobic exercise similarly impaired glucose tolerance upon refeeding and resulted in comparable decrements in continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics of glycaemic regulation over the 24 h after refeeding. Exercise appears ineffective in reversing fasting-induced glucose intolerance, which could reflect the mechanistic distinction between fasting-induced and pathological forms of insulin resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.