Evidence mapPaperPMID 42402811Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2026

Fasting-induced glucose intolerance is not impacted by the addition of daily exercise: A randomized crossover study.

Tori Bouck, Alexis Marcotte-Chénard, Darren Barg, Charlie Kanuka, Roderick E Sandilands, Spencer Ursel, Garett Jackson, Arwyn MacIntosh, Sean McIntyre, Sriyashika Nekkanti and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tori BouckSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Alexis Marcotte-ChénardSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-5330
Darren BargSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Charlie KanukaSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Roderick E SandilandsSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0508-0786
Spencer UrselSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Garett JacksonSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Arwyn MacIntoshSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Sean McIntyreSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Sriyashika NekkantiSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Kimberly DaySchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Hashim IslamSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathan P LittleSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3025-0156

Funding

NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019-0520UBC Institutional Start-up Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term fasting (48-72 h) impairs insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, but it is unclear if aerobic exercise - which is known to have insulin-sensitizing effects - can attenuate fasting-induced decrements in glucose homeostasis. To determine whether the addition of exercise to a short-term fast impacts glycaemic responses to refeeding, we implemented a randomized crossover design where 16 healthy adults (8 males and 8 females, 24±4 years) fasted for 48 h with and without the addition of daily cycling (50-min moderate-intensity continuous training + 5×1-min high-intensity interval training) performed at baseline and 24 h into the fast. Glycaemic responses to a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) were assessed via capillary measurements and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before and after the fast, as well as 24 h after refeeding. Capillary glucose and CGM incremental area under the curve (iAUC) during the 2-h mixed meal tolerance test increased at 48 h fasted relative to baseline (P<0.001), which was unaffected by the addition of exercise (condition × time interaction, P>0.364). The 2-h CGM iAUC reduced 24 h after refeeding compared to 48 h fasted (with or without exercise, P<0.001) but remained elevated relative to baseline (P = 0.01). Exploratory analyses revealed that 2-h capillary (P = 0.020) and CGM (P<0.001) glucose iAUC and plasma glucose (P<0.001) were elevated to a greater extent after refeeding in females compared to males, and females exhibited greater impairments in CGM metrics in the 24 h after refeeding (P<0.01). Our results suggest that combined moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training exercise does not attenuate fasting-induced perturbations in glucose homeostasis and that glucose intolerance persists 24 h after refeeding. KEY POINTS: Short-term fasting reduces insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, which manifests as exaggerated glycaemic responses to refeeding. Performing exercise during a fast could mitigate fasting-induced glucose intolerance, due to the well-established insulin-sensitizing effects of acute exercise. Here we report that a 48-h fast performed with or without the addition of daily aerobic exercise similarly impaired glucose tolerance upon refeeding and resulted in comparable decrements in continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics of glycaemic regulation over the 24 h after refeeding. Exercise appears ineffective in reversing fasting-induced glucose intolerance, which could reflect the mechanistic distinction between fasting-induced and pathological forms of insulin resistance.

Indexed as

ExerciseFastingGlucose IntoleranceAdultBlood GlucoseContinuous Glucose MonitoringCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInsulinMaleYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulinCGMcontinuous glucose monitorfasthigh‐intensity interval training (HIIT)insulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID42402811
PMCPMC13423017

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.