Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403257›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2026

Coding and Noncoding Uterine Small Extracellular Vesicle Content Differs in the Early Stages of Pregnancies Produced by Artificial Insemination and In Vitro Fertilization in Cattle.

Amanda de Oliveira Furlan, Alessandra Bridi, Jéssica Nora Drum, Liza Margareth Medeiros de Carvalho Sousa, Mariana Cordeiro Almeida, Juliana de Souza Felix, Luana Araujo Zutin, Isabelle Alexandrino Dos Santos, Flávia Regina Florencio de Athayde, Natália Francisco Scaramele and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Amanda de Oliveira FurlanDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandra BridiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jéssica Nora DrumDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Liza Margareth Medeiros de Carvalho SousaDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Cordeiro AlmeidaDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana de Souza FelixDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luana Araujo ZutinDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabelle Alexandrino Dos SantosDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Regina Florencio de AthaydeDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natália Francisco ScarameleDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Azzolin de SouzaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula de Carvalho PapaPolytechnic Institute UniLaSalle, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rouen, France.
Juliano Coelho da SilveiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4796-6393
Roberto Sartori FilhoDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danila Barreiro CamposDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Areia, Brazil.
Flavia Lombardi LopesDepartment of Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

BARD-US Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development IS-4799-15Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 14/00739-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/03798-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing a successful pregnancy relies on effective communication between the mother and fetus. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are pivotal in facilitating intercellular communication, transferring messenger RNA (mRNA), noncoding RNA (ncRNA), and proteins. Considering the prevalence of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in bovine production, despite its lower birth rate, we aimed to evaluate whether there are differences in transcript content in sEVs between pregnancies from artificial insemination fixed-time (FTAI) and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Uterine fluid was collected on Days 18 and 32 from AI- and IVF-derived pregnancies in beef cattle. sEVs were isolated, and total RNA was extracted for transcriptome and microtranscriptome analysis. Differences in transcript abundance were greatest when comparing Days 18 and 32 within the IVF-ET, suggesting that temporal changes in transcripts are highly influenced by reproductive technique. Gene set enrichment analysis showed 22 gene sets in IVF-ET18 x FTAI18, with mRNAs involved in embryonic pre-adhesion that may impair embryo fixation. In IVF-ET32 x IVF-ET18, target genes of differentially expressed (DE) microRNAs (miRNAs) were enriched in endocytosis pathway, while target genes of DE lncRNAs were enriched in complement and coagulation cascades pathway. In summary, sEVs derived from FTAI and IVF-ET pregnancies have different coding and noncoding transcript content, suggesting failures in maternal-fetal communication post-IVF.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesFertilization in VitroInsemination, ArtificialRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedUterusAnimalsCattleEmbryo TransferFemalePregnancyRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedbovineIVF‐ETmaternal‐fetal crosstalkncRNAsmall extracellular vesicle

Identifiers

PMID42403257
PMCPMC13334345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.