ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Natural Product-Based Nanomicelles: Properties, Fabrication Strategies, and Therapeutic Applications in Diseases.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many bioactive natural products suffer from poor water solubility, rapid metabolism, and low bioavailability, which severely limit their clinical application. Natural product‑based nanomicelles (NSNs), which integrate the delivery functions of nanocarriers with the intrinsic therapeutic activities of the materials themselves, offer a promising solution to this dilemma. NSNs are self‑assembled nanoscale delivery systems constructed from natural small molecules, natural polymers, and their derivatives. This review provides a systematic overview of NSNs. We first summarize their main fabrication strategies, including nanoprecipitation, dialysis, thin‑film hydration, chemical conjugation, and electrostatic interaction, and compare the biological characteristics of NSNs with those of synthetic polymer micelles. The core advantages of NSNs include excellent biocompatibility, intrinsic lesion‑targeting capability, and drug‑excipient synergy. Subsequently, we detail the mechanisms and therapeutic applications of NSNs in six major disease areas: anti‑infection, oncology, inflammation and autoimmune diseases, metabolic diseases, fibrotic diseases, and nervous system disorders. A cross‑disease analysis reveals that modulation of oxidative stress is a common core mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefits of NSNs. Finally, we critically discuss the major barriers to clinical translation, such as batch‑to‑batch variability of natural materials and good manufacturing practice compliance, and propose future directions including mechanism‑driven rational design, theranostics, and manufacturing scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.