ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
How socio-emotional learning in physical education curriculum affects student well-being: a moderated mediation analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Socio-emotional learning (SEL) has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor to students' well-being, particularly when integrated into school curricula such as physical education (PE). Drawing on the CASEL framework, Self-Determination Theory, and Ecological Systems Theory, this study examines how SEL embedded in PE influences student well-being, focusing on the mediating roles of emotional regulation and peer relationship quality, as well as the moderating effect of school climate. Methods: Data were collected from 452 high school students (aged 14-18) across three provinces in China using validated self-report measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to establish construct validity, followed by multilevel path modeling to test a moderated mediation model. Results: Results indicated that SEL was significantly associated with student well-being through emotional regulation in a manner consistent with the hypothesized indirect relationship, whereas peer relationship quality did not serve as a significant mediator. Moreover, the indirect effect of SEL on well-being via emotional regulation was significantly moderated by school climate, with stronger effects observed in more supportive environments. Bootstrapping analyses confirmed a significant total indirect effect through emotional regulation, while the pathway via peer relationships remained non-significant. Discussion: These findings are consistent with the view that emotional regulation represents an important psychological pathway associated with the relationship between SEL in PE and student well-being, and that a positive school climate enhances this effect. The study underscores the importance of integrating SEL within supportive school contexts to optimize its impact on adolescent well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.