ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin, mirabegron, and their combination for overactive bladder: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend either muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists for overactive bladder (OAB) treatment. These recommendations, however, are primarily based on short-term (12-week) clinical trials, leaving a critical gap in evidence regarding their long-term (≥1 year) efficacy and safety. Moreover, the long-term evidence synthesized here is limited to solifenacin and mirabegron, and its generalizability to other agents remains uncertain. Objective: To systematically compare the long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, and their combination in patients with OAB. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical studies published from inception to 2 April 2026. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in mean volume voided incontinence episodes per 24 h, and micturition frequency per 24 h. The secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse drug reactions Quantitative meta-analysis was performed only for safety outcomes using a random-effects model. For the primary efficacy outcomes, substantial heterogeneity (I Results: Initial screening identified 7,451 articles, of which five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. For long-term OAB management, combination therapy (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) may be more effective than each monotherapy in improving MVV and reducing mean incontinence episodes and micturition frequency. Compared to mirabegron 50mg, solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a potentially higher risk of ADRs such as dry mouth (RR 1.73, 95%CI 0.91-3.30, P = 0.10) and constipation (RR 2.46, 95%CI 1.16-5.19, P = 0.02), but a lower incidence of dizziness (RR 0.08, 95%CI 0.01-0.62, P = 0.02). Solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a lower risk of constipation and dry mouth compared to solifenacin 10 mg. Conclusion: For long-term OAB pharmacotherapy with the specific regimens evaluated, mirabegron 50 mg appears to offer a favorable profile due to its comparable efficacy and lower incidence of certain treatment-limiting ADRs. However, these findings cannot be generalized to other muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251056532, identifier CRD420251056532.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.