Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403713›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin, mirabegron, and their combination for overactive bladder: a systematic review.

Linlin Yang, Hongqiao Zhao, Shuna Xiao, Ziqi Ye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linlin YangDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Hongqiao ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Shuna XiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Ziqi YeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend either muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists for overactive bladder (OAB) treatment. These recommendations, however, are primarily based on short-term (12-week) clinical trials, leaving a critical gap in evidence regarding their long-term (≥1 year) efficacy and safety. Moreover, the long-term evidence synthesized here is limited to solifenacin and mirabegron, and its generalizability to other agents remains uncertain. Objective: To systematically compare the long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, and their combination in patients with OAB. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical studies published from inception to 2 April 2026. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in mean volume voided incontinence episodes per 24 h, and micturition frequency per 24 h. The secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse drug reactions Quantitative meta-analysis was performed only for safety outcomes using a random-effects model. For the primary efficacy outcomes, substantial heterogeneity (I Results: Initial screening identified 7,451 articles, of which five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. For long-term OAB management, combination therapy (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) may be more effective than each monotherapy in improving MVV and reducing mean incontinence episodes and micturition frequency. Compared to mirabegron 50mg, solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a potentially higher risk of ADRs such as dry mouth (RR 1.73, 95%CI 0.91-3.30, P = 0.10) and constipation (RR 2.46, 95%CI 1.16-5.19, P = 0.02), but a lower incidence of dizziness (RR 0.08, 95%CI 0.01-0.62, P = 0.02). Solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a lower risk of constipation and dry mouth compared to solifenacin 10 mg. Conclusion: For long-term OAB pharmacotherapy with the specific regimens evaluated, mirabegron 50 mg appears to offer a favorable profile due to its comparable efficacy and lower incidence of certain treatment-limiting ADRs. However, these findings cannot be generalized to other muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251056532, identifier CRD420251056532.

Indexed as

meta-analysismirabegronoveractive bladdersolifenacinsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42403713
PMCPMC13328022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.