ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Development of a multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill patients-a Delphi expert consensus study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore a multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill ICU patients in China for providing a standardized nutrition management process and improving the effect and safety of nutritional support. Methods: Our first draft of the "multidisciplinary nutrition management process for critical patients" and "enteral nutrition management process for critical patients", which included five steps and 31 criteria, was prepared through literature review and analysis, referring to the domestic and foreign nutrition management guidelines for critical patients, and referring to the nutrition management process for critically ill patients abroad. We recruited consulting experts from Beijing, Zhejiang, Jilin, Guangdong, and Chongqing in China. Using the Delphi method, we conducted expert consultations to evaluate the initially prepared standardized process, subsequently refining and adjusting items based on their feedback. Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, all 20 invited experts completed both rounds, 15 experts provided written opinions, and 43 expert opinions were collected. The nutrition management process was bifurcated into "multidisciplinary nutrition management process for critically ill patients" and "enteral nutrition management process for critically ill patients," which collectively included five steps (within 24 h of admission, within 24-48 h of admission, after 48 h of admission and during hospitalization, during transfer to another department, and during discharge) and 31 standard processes. The 31 criteria were rated as desirable or necessary by 17-20 evaluators (85-100%). Conclusion: The multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill patients established by us using the Delphi method is scientific and standardized and shows promise as a practical tool that may improve for nutritional management. Relevance to clinical practice: Structured multidisciplinary nutrition management operational processes can guide clinical practice. They has potential for implementation in similar settings in the clinical nutrition management of critically ill patients in the ICU or other departments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.