Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Ultrasound-assessed abdominal fat distribution and its relation to sarcopenia parameters in community-dwelling young older adults: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06871384 (Polyphenols From Nonalcoholic Red Wine and Healthy Aging), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Polyphenols From Nonalcoholic Red Wine and Healthy Aging: an Opportunity to Understand Diet Modulation of the Aging Process From a Multidimensional Perspective
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ageing is associated with significant changes in body composition, including increased abdominal adiposity and reduced skeletal muscle strength, mass, and physical performance, known as sarcopenia. However, the association of specific abdominal fat distribution in relation to sarcopenia parameters remains poorly understood. Objective: To assess abdominal fat distribution by ultrasound (US) and explore its association with sarcopenia parameters in community-dwelling young older adults aged 60-74 years. Methods: This cross-sectional study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06871384) included 72 participants (68.1% women). Abdominal fat distribution was assessed by US, measuring total abdominal fat, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and VAT/SAT ratio. Muscle strength was evaluated using a hand grip dynamometer, muscle mass indices [skeletal muscle mass Index (SMI) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI)] by BIA and physical performance by gait speed (GS). Linear regression analysis was adjusted by sex, age and physical activity. Results: Participants were 67.11 ± 4.4 years old [68.1% (49/72) women], 86.1% (62/72) were non-sarcopenic, and 71.4% (50/72) were non-obese. After regression analysis, in all population, VAT was positively associated with muscle mass indices. SAT was negatively associated with GS and relative handgrip strength (HGS/BW). In men, VAT was positively associated with ASMI and inversely associated with HGS/BW. In women, SAT was positively associated with ASMI and inversely associated with HGS/BW and GS, whereas VAT was positively associated with SMI and ASMI and inversely associated with HGS/BW. Conclusion: US-assessed abdominal fat distribution showed sex-specific associations with sarcopenia parameters. In men and in women, VAT was positively associated with muscle mass and negatively associated with muscle strength. Whereas in women, SAT was the only fat depot negatively associated with physical performance. These results suggest that abdominal fat distribution may influence physical performance and relative muscle strength in ageing populations, highlighting the importance of evaluating abdominal fat distribution when assessing sarcopenia parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.