ArticleAcademia nutrition and dietetics2026
Fluid intake in term and preterm infants exposed to maternal diabetes.
Article in Academia nutrition and dietetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes (DM) in pregnancy is associated with obesity and cardiometabolic abnormalities in childhood. Our prior work has shown that preterm infants exposed to DM in pregnancy have differences in early growth trajectory compared with preterm infants not exposed to DM. The influence of early nutrition on growth patterns in preterm infants exposed to DM in pregnancy is not known. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of DM in pregnancy on early total fluid intake (TFI) and weight change during newborn hospitalization. Materials and methods: In a prospective cohort of preterm (30-36 weeks) and term infants, nutrition information was obtained from the medical record and adjusted linear mixed effects models used to determine differences in average TFI between DM exposure groups. Results: Among 149 infants, the DM group ( Conclusions: The observed differences in TFI in this cohort may be related to feeding maturity in this at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.