Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404503›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Typhoid Fever Among University Students in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Most Nazma Parvin, Md Muhtamim Hussain Rifat, Sonia Akther Papia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Most Nazma ParvinDepartment of Pharmacy Stamford University Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-6255
Md Muhtamim Hussain RifatDepartment of Pharmacy Stamford University Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7043-8897
Sonia Akther PapiaDepartment of Pharmacy Stamford University Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8645-8823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Typhoid fever remains a significant public health concern in Bangladesh due to overcrowding, insufficient sanitation, unsafe food and contaminated water exposure, and antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this research is to gather evidence-based information to guide future public health programs and educational initiatives specifically targeting university students. Methods: From August 2024 to July 2025, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 470 students from three universities in Dhaka city. A structured questionnaire was developed following standard guidelines, and data were collected through convenient sampling. Comparative analyses, Pearson's correlation, multivariable linear regression models, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to statistically evaluate the linkage between outcome measures across various sociodemographic and academic variables. Results: Among 470 valid responses, 127 participants were male (27.02%), and 343 were female (72.98%). Mean ± SD scores were 80.05 ± 16.34 for knowledge, 73.99 ± 24.60 for attitude, and 60.93 ± 16.01 for practice. Knowledge showed weak but significant positive correlations with attitude ( Conclusion: Overall participants in the study had relatively good knowledge and favorable attitudes toward typhoid fever. However, some important gaps remained in preventive practices and vaccination. Behavior-focused health education, improved access to the typhoid conjugate vaccine, and strengthened campus-based WASH strategies may help in improving typhoid prevention among university students.

Indexed as

BangladeshKAPTyphoiduniversity students

Identifiers

PMID42404503
PMCPMC13332866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.