ReviewBMJ oncology2026
Beyond auto-segmentation: the case for planning and dosimetry AI in head and neck radiation oncology.
Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly integrated into radiation oncology workflows, with the most visible successes occurring in auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs at risk. While these advances have delivered meaningful efficiency gains and improved standardisation, their impact on clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer remains indirect. In head and neck radiotherapy, long-term toxicity and quality of life are influenced not only by contouring accuracy but more directly by nuanced dosimetric trade-offs during treatment planning. This narrative review synthesises the current landscape of AI applications in head and neck radiotherapy planning and highlights the limitations of a segmentation-dominated paradigm. We review the evolution of planning AI from knowledge-based statistical models to deep learning-based dose prediction and emerging reasoning-driven frameworks. We also aim to discuss how these approaches may function as complementary components of a broader planning intelligence ecosystem. In addition to potential patient-level benefits, we examine the system-level implications of planning and dosimetry AI. Finally, we outline key considerations for the safe evaluation and deployment of planning AI. Together, this review positions planning and dosimetry AI as an enabling infrastructure for predictive, adaptive and equitable head and neck radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.