SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Structural gaps in referral and treatment pathways for gambling-related harm: a systematic review of health system responses using the antecedents-decision-outcomes framework.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gambling-related harm is increasingly recognized as a public mental health concern, yet referral pathways into formal treatment and support services remain poorly understood. Weak or absent referral structures may delay engagement with care and limit coordination across health and support systems. This review aimed to map structural and system-level factors shaping referral and treatment pathways for gambling-related harm. Particular attention was given to mechanisms influencing help-seeking, healthcare system readiness, and the extent to which gambling environments facilitate transitions into formal care. Methods: A systematic review was conducted across multiple databases covering literature published between 2014 and 2024. Studies were included if they examined help-seeking, referral pathways, service engagement, or system-level responses to harmful gambling. From an initial pool of 8,178 studies, 5,230 were screened, and 39 met the inclusion criteria. Findings were analyzed using ADO-guided thematic synthesis as the primary analytical approach, complemented by abstract-based descriptive bibliometric mapping. Results: Ten core themes were identified across the ADO phases. Antecedent-level findings highlighted barriers related to service visibility, system readiness, and the framing of responsibility. Decision-phase themes included help-seeking triggers, digital interventions, and the role of referral gatekeepers. Outcome themes focused on treatment engagement, dropouts, and user experiences of treatment. Across the included peer-reviewed literature, few studies reported structured referral pathways between gambling platforms and healthcare services, which shows an important gap in the documented evidence base. Responsibility framing emerged as a cross-cutting influence shaping how institutions recognize and respond to gambling-related harm. Conclusion: The evidence base remains limited, with most studies descriptive in nature. The findings highlight structural weaknesses in current referral and treatment ecosystems, particularly the absence of formalized pathways linking gambling environments to healthcare systems. Addressing these gaps will require stronger coordination between gambling operators, healthcare services, and regulators, alongside implementation research to develop and evaluate system-level referral models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.