ReviewAtherosclerosis plus2026
Cholesterol in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a bystander, a biomarker, or a target?
Review in Atherosclerosis plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor neuron loss. In addition to the different pathogenic mechanisms, in recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward the role of lipid metabolism in ALS pathogenesis, although the clinical relevance of lipid alterations in ALS may differ from their well-established role in cardiovascular disease. This review critically examines the multifactorial relationship between cholesterol and ALS through three perspectives: (1) as a risk factor for disease onset, (2) as a prognostic biomarker of disease progression, and (3) as a potential therapeutic target. Epidemiological and genetic studies suggest a complex and sometimes contradictory association between lipid profile and ALS risk. Elevated LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol have been linked to increased disease susceptibility in some cohorts, with Mendelian randomization studies supporting a potential causal role. Conversely, evidence regarding HDL-cholesterol remains conflicting and may be influenced by sex-specific and metabolic factors. As a prognostic biomarker, hyperlipidemia has been variably associated with prolonged survival in ALS patients; however, these findings often lose significance after adjusting for body mass index and nutritional status, suggesting that lipid levels may reflect systemic metabolic reserve rather than directly modulating disease progression. Pharmacological modulation of cholesterol reveals further complexity. While statins are generally not associated with increased ALS risk in clinical studies, preclinical models show divergent effects: some statins accelerate disease progression, while others like lovastatin may be protective. Other lipid-lowering drugs, including fibrates and PCSK9 inhibitors, may also influence ALS-related pathways beyond cholesterol lowering, although their potential role remains to be clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.