Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405137›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Engineering intrinsically radiolabeled nanoparticles for imaging and therapy: a decade of design strategies and insights.

Sanchita Ghosh, Rubel Chakravarty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanchita GhoshRadiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay Mumbai 400085 India rubelc@barc.gov.in rubelchakravarty@gmail.com.
Rubel ChakravartyRadiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay Mumbai 400085 India rubelc@barc.gov.in rubelchakravarty@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-8636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of nanotechnology and nuclear medicine has opened new possibilities for cancer imaging and therapy, but conventional chelator-based radiolabeling approaches often suffer from limited stability and can alter the inherent properties of nanomaterials. Intrinsic radiolabeling has emerged as a promising alternative, enabling the direct incorporation of radionuclides within the nanoparticle matrix through mechanisms such as lattice doping, isotopic substitution, coordination to structural sites, or entrapment during nanoparticle formation. In this approach, the radionuclide becomes an integral part of the material architecture, thereby improving radiochemical stability while preserving the intrinsic physicochemical properties of the nanomaterial. Emphasis is given to how rational design and synthetic strategies have evolved to address key challenges in stability, scalability, and biological performance. A range of nanoplatforms-including inorganic systems, protein-based hybrid nanoparticles, and biomaterial-assisted systems such as hydroxyapatite and polymers-are discussed to illustrate the diversity of approaches explored. Particular attention is devoted to methodologies such as

Identifiers

PMID42405137
PMCPMC13330772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.