ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026
The interplay between sexual activity, athletic performance, and recovery in athletes: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual activity is a common yet poorly understood aspect of athletes' lives, frequently surrounded by cultural beliefs and traditional practices that lack consistent scientific support. Despite widespread assumptions that sexual activity impairs athletic performance or recovery, empirical evidence remains fragmented and often contradictory. This narrative review synthesizes current literature examining the physiological, psychological, and contextual effects of sexual activity on athletic performance and post-exercise recovery. Mechanistic pathways involving hormonal fluctuations, autonomic nervous system regulation, cardiovascular and neuromuscular responses, sleep quality, and psychological well-being are examined to clarify biologically plausible effects. Evidence indicates that sexual activity typically elicits mild physiological responses comparable to light physical exertion and does not meaningfully deplete energy stores or impair strength, endurance, power, or coordination when occurring several hours or more before competition. Acute hormonal changes, including transient variations in testosterone, cortisol, prolactin, and oxytocin, appear short-lived and unlikely to exert direct negative effects on performance. Psychological outcomes, such as reduced anxiety, improved mood, emotional bonding, and stress regulation, may support readiness and recovery in some athletes, while negative effects are more often linked to sleep disruption, interpersonal stress, or maladaptive timing rather than sexual activity itself. The review highlights that individual variability, belief systems, relationship context, sport-specific demands, and sleep timing play a larger role than physiology alone in shaping outcomes. A critical limitation of the current evidence base is the predominant focus on male athletes, which constrains sex-specific conclusions and clinical guidance. Current evidence does not support universal sexual abstinence before competition, though personalized strategies may be appropriate based on individual responses and preferences. Overall, sexual activity appears largely neutral with respect to athletic performance and may offer recovery-related benefits when appropriately timed and contextualized. Future research should prioritize controlled designs, sex-balanced samples, sport-specific analyses, and objective recovery markers to inform individualized, evidence-based recommendations for athletes and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.