Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42405351›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026

Early response toward clinical remission with dupilumab in severe asthma: Real-world cohort.

Kenji Mizumura, Yasuhiro Gon, Akihiko Tanaka, Ryosuke Ozoe, Yusuke Kurosawa, Shiho Yamada, Yutaka Kozu, Shuichiro Maruoka, Hironori Sagara, Norihiro Harada and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Kenji MizumuraDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro GonDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko TanakaDivision of Respiratory and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke OzoeDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke KurosawaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shiho YamadaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka KozuDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichiro MaruokaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hironori SagaraDivision of Respiratory and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Norihiro HaradaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumiko AbeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhisa TakahashiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taisuke AkamatsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Toshihiro ShiraiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsunori MasakiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi FukunagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Konomi KobayashiDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki NagaseDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuaki MiyaharaDepartment of Medical Technology, Okayama University Academic Field of Health Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Arihiko KanehiroSocial Medical Corporation Foundation of St. Francis Himeji St. Mary's Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Noboru KitamuraJinyu Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Naruhiko SugiharaJinyu Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumio KumasawaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Akabane Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko Terada-HirashimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki HojoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuyuki ChibanaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Mayoko TsujiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Etsuko TagayaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical remission is an important treatment goal in severe asthma; however, durable remission frameworks generally require sustained disease control over longer periods. Whether dupilumab induces an early response toward this goal in real-world practice remains unclear. Objective: We sought to evaluate early response toward clinical remission at 24 weeks after dupilumab initiation and to identify baseline factors associated with this outcome. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective cohort at 13 Japanese institutions, adults with severe asthma treated with dupilumab were followed for 24 weeks. Given the limited observation period, an early response toward clinical remission was defined as meeting modified 4-component remission-oriented criteria: Asthma Control Test score 20 or higher, FEV Results: Of 103 enrolled patients, 70 had complete data; 38 (54.3%; 95% CI, 41.9%-66.3%) met the modified remission-oriented criteria at week 24. Higher baseline Feno, higher FEV Conclusions: Approximately half of the patients met the modified remission-oriented criteria at 24 weeks after dupilumab initiation, representing an early response toward clinical remission rather than sustained clinical remission itself. Baseline Feno and lung function may help identify patients more likely to show this response.

Indexed as

baseline factorsbiomarkersdupilumabearly response toward clinical remissionFenoSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID42405351
PMCPMC13331999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.