ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Validation of aerobic threshold assessment using a sweat lactate sensor during arm crank exercise by healthy adults.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of the aerobic threshold (AeT) using a sweat lactate sensor has been validated primarily during lower limb exercise. This study aimed to examine whether sweat-based AeT assessment is also applicable during upper limb exercise. In this cross-sectional study, 27 healthy young individuals performed an incremental arm crank ergometer test while sweat lactate levels were continuously monitored using a wearable sensor attached to the forehead. Expired gas variables, sweat rate, and heart rate were simultaneously recorded. Correlation analyses were conducted between the lactate threshold in sweat (sLT) and the ventilatory threshold (VT1). Sweating was observed in all participants, and the sLT was successfully identified using the sensor. Strong correlations were observed between sLT and VT1 (workload: r = 0.904, exercise time: r = 0.859, both p < 0.01). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the heart rates at sLT and VT1. These findings demonstrate that sLT corresponds closely with VT1 during arm crank exercise, supporting the robustness of sweat-based AeT assessment across different exercise modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.