ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Aging with dual burdens: cross-national evidence on mortality among older Hispanic adults with diabetes and dementia.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOlder Hispanic adults in the United States and Mexico face a high burden of diabetes and dementia, yet cross-national differences in absolute survival associated with these conditions remain unclear. This study compared 5-year survival among Mexican-origin adults aged 74 and older by condition profile and assessed gender differences.
methodsTwo representative longitudinal surveys were harmonized: the Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly-Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (H-EPESE-CMS) linked data for the United States and the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) for Mexico. Flexible parametric survival models and g-computation estimated standardized 5-year survival, risk differences, and risk ratios across four groups: no condition, diabetes only, dementia only, and dual conditions.
resultsSurvival declined steadily with condition burden in both countries. In the United States, standardized 5-year survival was 73.3% (no condition), 57.9% (diabetes only), 49.2% (dementia only), and 36.6% (dual conditions). In Mexico, absolute survival was higher across all groups: 77.5%, 67.9%, 56.8%, and 40.9%, respectively. Hazard ratios confirmed elevated mortality risks, particularly when both were present. Women had lower mortality than men in the United States, but higher mortality in Mexico. However, gender did not significantly modify the association between condition burden and survival in either country. DISCUSSION: Five-year survival declines with condition burden in both countries, with lower absolute survival and steeper relative penalties in the U.S. Divergent gender patterns across countries reflect overall mortality differences rather than condition-specific modification, highlighting the need for tailored and integrated approaches to chronic disease and dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.