ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Implementing an Asthma Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians' and Patients' Perspectives on Its Sustainability.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAdherence to maintenance asthma inhaled therapy remains suboptimal globally. An asthma patient decision aid (PDA) can facilitate shared decision-making between patients and physicians when selecting asthma treatment options. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of the clinicians and patients in the implementation of this PDA in the primary care practice and to identify optimal delivery approaches for its sustainability.
methodThirty primary care doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and 20 patients who were prescribed inhaled corticosteroids were interviewed through focus group discussions and individually to gather their perspectives on using a locally designed asthma PDA. The transcribed qualitative data were analysed and presented using the Normalisation Process Theory framework.
resultsPlatform preferences differed among the patients, with older patients favouring print formats whilst younger patients preferred digital versions. Nonetheless all participants agreed that the PDA should be written in layman's language, have large font sizes, and good visual design. Most of the clinicians highlighted time constraints as a barrier to PDA use and emphasised the need for easy access to the materials during consultations. Clinicians suggested mutual sharing of experiences with the PDA to address implementation hurdles and facilitate integration into clinical practice and workflow, alongside conducting regular content updates.
conclusionSuccessful asthma PDA implementation requires multi-format delivery to accommodate diverse patient preferences and streamlined access to address clinician time constraints. Peer sharing and regular content updates are essential for sustained adoption. This study's findings provide practical guidance for integrating the asthma PDA into primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.