ArticleDiscover nano2026
Experimental workflow to evaluate nanoparticles combined with photon and carbon-ion medical irradiations in spheroids.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment protocols of cancer combining radiotherapy and nanoparticles are rapidly evolving. To evaluate their efficacy, spheroids provide a 3D in vitro model that better reflects tumor architecture than traditional 2D cell cultures. This article presents a workflow to prepare and characterize spheroids, optimize the protocols for irradiation with medical photon and ion beams and for exposure to nanoparticles, and, finally, to evaluate the effects of radiation, nanoparticles, and their combination on spheroids. Illustrations with HeLa, U-87 MG, and BxPC-3 tumor cell lines and HDFn are reported. Using this workflow, we observed that spheroids exhibit variable cell organization and interstitial spaces, which affect nutrient and oxygen diffusion and, consequently, cell proliferation. These structural differences also affect enzyme diffusion, limiting the applicability of the clonogenic assay in densely packed spheroids, as the assay requires enzymatic disaggregation of the spheroids. The clonogenic assay remains essential for quantitatively comparing spheroid irradiation results with 2D cell culture experiments. It has long been used as the reference method in radiobiology because it assesses mitotic death and long-term proliferative capacity. Protocols were adapted to ensure the feasibility of the clonogenic assay when possible, depending on cell line characteristics. Interstitial spaces also influenced nanoparticle internalization, which was more efficient in spheroids with larger interstitial spaces. This workflow and associated techniques verified the characteristic effect of carbon ion irradiation with a relative biological effectiveness of ~ 3 and demonstrated a ~ 30% radioenhancing effect of platinum nanoparticles at 2 Gy under 6 MV photons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.