ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2026
A brief fall-risk screening tool to support early rehabilitation referral in hemodialysis patients: multicenter prospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a brief screening tool to identify hemodialysis (HD) patients at risk of falls who may benefit from early rehabilitation and prevention strategies.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted across nine centers. Falls were recorded prospectively for 1 year following baseline assessment using the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Participants were categorized into development and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was used to identify KCL items associated with falls, and a short version was constructed by summing odds ratios (OR). Predictive accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with the standard KCL. The cutoff value was determined using the Youden index.
resultsA total of 403 patients (median age 70.0 years, 42.1% female) were included, of whom 117 (29.0%) experienced a fall during 1 year. Five items were significantly associated with falls, including climbing stairs without a handrail (OR 2.3), history of falls (OR 3.1), fear of falling while walking (OR 2.3), inability to recognize dates (OR 2.1), and feelings of uselessness (OR 2.2). Based on these, a 0-12 point short version was developed. In the validation cohort (n = 100), the AUC was 0.75, comparable to the standard KCL (0.70, p = 0.39). A cutoff of 4.6 yielded a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 38.4%.
conclusionsThe short KCL showed similar predictive accuracy to the standard version with less burden. Despite modest specificity, it may be a practical tool to identify high-risk HD patients and support early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42406293What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.