ArticleJAMA network open2026
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Patterns and Metastatic Prostate Cancer in US Veterans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Metastatic prostate cancer (PC) incidence has increased in US men, partly due to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening recommendations. However, few studies have examined contemporary PSA screening practices in large US health care systems. Objective: To describe and examine contemporary PSA testing practices associated with metastatic PC incidence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included veterans within the Veterans Health Administration that received a prostate needle biopsy (PNB) between January 2015 and December 2023 with follow-up through 2024, excluding those with a history of PC. Data were analyzed between July 1, 2023, and November 6, 2025. Exposures: PSA tests were retrieved from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and categorized by age at first VA PSA (<50, 50-59, and ≥60 years) and by longest interval between consecutive VA PSA tests in the 5 years before PNB (≤24 vs >24 months). Clinical, laboratory, pathological, demographic, and census block group-level socioeconomic status data were obtained from the VA Multi-OMICS Analysis Platform for Prostate Cancer database. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) from time of first VA PSA to first PNB, evaluated risk of metastatic (regional or distant) vs localized PC or benign diagnosis, and adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Results: There were 103 067 participants of whom 20 233 (19.6%) were younger than 50 years at first PSA, 31 546 (30.6%) were non-Hispanic Black, 58 264 (56.5%) were non-Hispanic White, and 13 277 (12.9%) had other race or ethnicity. Of all participants, 22 190 (21.5%) had a first PSA value of 1 ng/mL or less, 52 939 (51.4%) had a screening interval of 24 months or less, and 3773 (3.7%) were diagnosed with metastatic PC at time of PNB. Compared with men aged younger than 50 years at first PSA, those aged 50 to 59 years (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.24-1.29) and 60 years or older (aHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.33-2.42) had higher risk of metastatic PC. Men with longer screening intervals had higher risk of metastatic PC (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16). Men aged younger than 50 years with shorter screening intervals had lower rates of metastatic PC (adjusted risk ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.09-0.12) compared with men aged 60 years or older with longer screening intervals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, few veterans had the most favorable combinations of screening factors in relation to metastatic PC, suggesting potential for further screening optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.