Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406399›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Postacute COVID-19 Symptoms and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.

Kaushik Ghosh, Rachael Zuckerman, Yevgeniy Feyman, E John Orav, Steven Sheingold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaushik GhoshOffice of Health Policy, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Rachael ZuckermanResearch and Analytics, American Medical Group Association, Alexandria, Virginia.
Yevgeniy FeymanDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
E John OravDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven SheingoldOffice of Health Policy, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection include fatigue, respiratory symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction. However, the extent to which these symptoms contribute to increased health care utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries remains unclear. Objective: To quantify differences in postacute symptoms and health care utilization and spending between traditional Medicare beneficiaries with COVID-19 and matched control beneficiaries without COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used traditional Medicare claims from February 2020 through November 2022. Beneficiaries with a documented COVID-19 diagnosis were matched 1:5 to beneficiaries without COVID-19 based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Four variant-defined cohorts (original strain and Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants) were analyzed. Follow-up extended through 40 weeks after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from February 2020 to November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnosis of 21 postacute COVID-19 symptoms, all-cause health care utilization, and Medicare spending were compared between those with COVID-19 and matched control beneficiaries using logistic and linear regression models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: The cohort study included 937 077 Medicare beneficiaries with COVID-19 and 4 808 573 matched control beneficiaries without COVID-19 (3 109 789 females [54.1%]), with most beneficiaries (4 880 497 [84.9%]) aged 65 years or older. During the acute phase of infection (diagnosis week), beneficiaries with COVID-19 were 41.71 (95% CI, 41.62-41.91) percentage points more likely to receive at least 1 postacute symptom diagnosis than control beneficiaries. This difference declined to 5.22 (95% CI, 5.11-5.32) percentage points during weeks 1 to 12 and to 1.94 (95% CI, 1.81-2.05) percentage points during weeks 13 to 40. Medicare spending was $7933.13 higher (95% CI, $7904.12-$7962.14) in the acute phase, decreasing to $232.31 (95% CI, $230.11-$234.14) per week in weeks 1 to 12 and to $28.21 (95% CI, $27.11-$30.13) per week in weeks 13 to 40. Differences in health care utilization followed a similar pattern, decreasing to 0.05 (95% CI, 0.05-0.06) visits per week in weeks 1 to 12 and to 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02-0.03) visits per week in weeks 13 to 40. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of traditional Medicare beneficiaries across major COVID-19 variants, postacute symptom diagnoses and health care utilization and spending were substantially higher in the acute phase of COVID-19 but diminished over time, approaching levels observed in matched control beneficiaries without COVID-19 by 3 months after infection. These findings suggest limited long-term excess health care utilization or spending attributable to COVID-19 infection among older adults.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health ExpendituresMedicarePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID42406399
PMCPMC13338808

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.